Legal Opinion

St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Donahoo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1921No. 11058PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; E. F. Lester, Assigned Judge. Action by Roy Donahoo and four others, by their guardian .and next friend, M. C. Burrell, to recover damages for the wrongful death of their father, J. A. Donahoo, against the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Hughes county by Roy Donahoo, Forest Donahoo, Carliss Donahoo, Vera Donahoo, and Albert Donahoo, by their guardian and next, friend, M. C. Burrell, defendants in error, against the St Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, to recover damages for the death of J. A. Donahoo, who was killed in the yards of the defendant company at Hen-ryetta on March 25, 1917. The wife of J. A. Donahoo, deceased, died subsequent to the death of her husband and before this action was commenced; the above named plaintiffs being the minor children of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Palmer v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Lowden v. FriddleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Clanton v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PedigoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Black v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API