Legal Opinion · Dissent

PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 2011Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Because the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) found that Claimant suffered a psychic workplace injury in the nature of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the occurrence and causation of which are incontrovertibly attributable to a specific abnormal workplace event (Event),1 I would conclude that this workplace injury is compensable under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).2 Because I would affirm the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), I respectfully dissent.

As our Supreme Court has concluded, a claimant is entitled to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. RAG (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, L.P. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API