Legal Opinion
Burge v. Michael
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1963No. Civ. No. 89PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The lower court consolidated Burge v. Michael, No. 56304, and Michael v. Burge, No. 59350, for trial. Since the cases are in no way related except that the people involved are the same, they must be treated as though separate appeals had been taken.
Burge v. Michael, No. 56304
The business transactions involved in this case arose from the unusual circumstances of an accountant financing his client’s drive-in restaurant venture. Like most unusual business arrangements which develop according to the exigencies of a touch-and-go business, the final settlement was made in court, and not without…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Costerisan v. DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rodman v. Blake CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014