Legal Opinion
Schwindt v. Billiwhack Stock Farms, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1941No. Civ. No. 12896PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover a sum due upon a mutual, open, and current account, defendants appeal.
The evidence being viewed most favorably to plaintiff (respondent), the essential facts are:
Plaintiff had been employed by the Valley Dairy Company in Los Angeles for a number of years at a salary of $275 per month. Defendant Fratkin was an officer of the Valley Dairy Company. The latter part of 1932 or the first part of 1933 plaintiff had a conversation with defendant Fratkin, president of defendant corporation, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Norton v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Arocena v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Gould v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- E. P. Hinkel & Co. v. Washington Carpet Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Burchell v. RohnertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955