Peters Corp. v. New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} In McMinn v. MBF Operating Acquisition Corp. (McMinn II), 2007-NMSC-040, 142 N.M. 160, 164 P.3d 41, we recently interpreted New Mexico’s dissent and appraisal statute, which gives shareholders who dissent from certain corporate transactions the right to receive fair value for their shares from the corporation. See NMSA 1978, § 53-15-3 (1983); McMinn II, 2007-NMSC-040, ¶ 2. We held that Section 53-15-3(D), which purports to make appraisal the exclusive remedy for shareholders who possess such statutory rights, does not apply to conflict-of-interest merger…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,610 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gerson Blatt, Barton S. Udell, and John PullmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,731 Arnold S. Wellman v. Fairleigh S. Dickinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Investment Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Miller v. Bank of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.