Legal Opinion
Leitzsey v. Coombe
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1998No. 6:95-cv-06410PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Eddie Leitzsey, appearing pro se, commenced this action on August 24, 1995, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, who is currently an inmate at Southport Correctional Facility, alleges that on or about December 27, 1994, while he was incarcerated at Attica Correctional Facility (“Attica”), defendants violated his constitutional rights under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The defendants, Philip Coombe, Walter Kelly, M. Giambruno, T. Dixon, Eric Urban, and Patricia Priestley, were employees or agents of the New York State…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jenkins v. DOCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Harnage v. BrighthauptDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Farid v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Allah v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Wesolowski v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007