Legal Opinion
Harnage v. Brighthaupt
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 1, 2016No. Civil No. 3:12cv1521(AWT)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, James Harnage (“Har-nage”), who is incarcerated within Connecticut’s correctional system, brings this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Because of the number of claims and defendants in this action, the claims have been separated into three groups. The claims at issue in the instant motion are the remaining claims in Counts One, Three, and Five of the plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. No. 112).1 Harnage alleges in these three counts that defendants, *406who are current or former…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Amanda Mae Bachman v. C. Flowers, Warden, FCI DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Ashby v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Baltas v. BowersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Baltas v. MaigaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- George v. County of WestchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.