Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Santema
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Purchaser sued sellers and the City of White in connection with statements that certain land was zoned for industrial use. Claiming that he relied on those statements, he brought an action for “negligent misrepresentation” because he was not able to develop the land- for industrial use. Summary judgment was granted to all defendants. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2] In July of 1994, Keith Meyer (Meyer) approached Darwin Willmott (Willmott) and Leonard Santema (Santema) to buy two lots which they owned in White, South Dakota. Meyer wished to build and operate a trucking terminal on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Aschoff v. Mobil Oil Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Carolina Chloride, Inc. v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Fisher v. KahlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Harms v. Northland Ford DealersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Total Auctions & Real Estate, LLC v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.