Legal Opinion
Board of County Commissioners v. Conder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 9, 1996No. 95SC431PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
This case presents the issue of whether a county can adopt a requirement in its subdivision regulations that subdivision proposals comply with the county’s master plan provisions, and then rely upon non-compliance' with master plan provisions in denying a subdivision application. The Board of County Commissioners of Larimer County denied the application of Steve Conder and Wendy Sommervold for a proposed subdivision in rural Larimer County. On certiorari review under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), the Larimer County District Court affirmed the denial. Con-der and Sommervold appealed, and the Colorado…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Van Sickle v. BoyesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Cottrell v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Ford Leasing Development Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- City of Colorado Springs v. SecurCare Self Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Widder v. Durango School District No. 9-RSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- DeLong v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Wolf Creek Ski Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.