Legal Opinion
Van Sickle v. Boyes
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 25, 1990No. 89SA242PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
James H. Van Sickle appeals 1 the district court’s ruling and order that affirmed the order of the hearing officer and rejected Van Sickle’s constitutional challenges to application of the City of Boulder’s Life Safety Code (Safety Code). 2 The Boulder Fire Department inspected a building owned by Van Sickle and issued an order to correct ten violations of the Safety Code. Van Sickle obtained review of the Fire Department’s order by Steven R. Hall, a hearing officer for the City of Boulder, who modified the order in part and affirmed. On appeal to the district court, Van Sickle sought review…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Freedom Colorado Information, Inc. v. El Paso County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- City of Colorado Springs v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.