Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Bowser

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 29, 2022No. 2:17-cv-01839Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MICHAEL LEE BOYLES, Case No. 2:17-cv-01839-MO Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. TROY BOWSER, Respondent. Matthew A. Schindler Attorney at Law 1500 SW 11th Ave. Ste. Unit 2101 Portland, OR 97201 Attorney for Petitioner Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General Samuel A. Kubernick, Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97310 Attorneys for Respondent MOSMAN, District Judge. Petitioner brings this habeas corpus case pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging the legality of his Multnomah County…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API