Scheper v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Leroy Scheper appeals from an order of the trial court that sustained the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1984). On appeal Scheper alleges that the Intoxilyzer test results lacked sufficient foundation and the trial court erred in receiving those results into evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 26, 1985, at approximately 12:49 a.m., Officer David Fraser arrested appellant Leroy Scheper for driving while intoxicated. Fraser read Scheper the implied consent advisory, and Scheper agreed to take a breath test.
Fraser…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bielejeski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Kooi v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Melin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Pasek v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Feil v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- McGregor v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- DeBoer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.