Legal Opinion

Scheper v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1986No. C7-85-1701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Leroy Scheper appeals from an order of the trial court that sustained the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1984). On appeal Scheper alleges that the Intoxilyzer test results lacked sufficient foundation and the trial court erred in receiving those results into evidence. We affirm.

FACTS

On May 26, 1985, at approximately 12:49 a.m., Officer David Fraser arrested appellant Leroy Scheper for driving while intoxicated. Fraser read Scheper the implied consent advisory, and Scheper agreed to take a breath test.

Fraser…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Bielejeski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Kooi v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Pasek v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Feil v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. McGregor v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. DeBoer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API