Legal Opinion
Feil v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1986No. C3-85-1632PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Respondent’s driver’s license was revoked when his Intoxilyzer 5000 test disclosed an alcohol concentration of .12. Respondent petitioned for judicial review. The trial court rescinded the revocation, finding that the Commissioner did not make a prima facie showing that the test was reliable. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals. Respondent did not file a brief. We determine the case pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 142.03. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent stipulated at the implied consent hearing that the only issue was the validity of the breath test. Officer Arthur G.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kadrlik v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ahrens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Evers v. WillabyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Schultz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Adams v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015