Banks v. State

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, Nathaniel Banks (“Banks”), appeals from final judgments entered in the Superior Court. Following a jury trial, Banks was convicted of Assault in the Third Degree, Carrying a Concealed Deadly Weapon, and two Counts of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. In this direct appeal, Banks raises one claim of error. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it restricted Banks’ ability to call witnesses *645to testify about certain prior acts of the complainant, Paulette Saunders (“Saunders”), and thereby violated his federal Constitutional right…