Legal Opinion

Lampkins v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 2, 1983PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In these appeals, the cases having been consolidated, the defendants seek reversal of their convictions for Murder in the First Degree (11 Del.C. § 636), Conspiracy in the First Degree (11 Del.C. § 513), Possession of a Deadly Weapon during the Commission of a Felony (11 Del.C. § 1447) and Burglary in the Second Degree (11 Del.C. § 825). Both defendants contend that the Trial Court committed reversible error in denying their motions for severance. Defendant Lampkins further contends that the Court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a statement which he gave…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Tricoche v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Shelton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API