Legal Opinion
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 23, 2018No. 17-1239PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff AngioDynamics has moved for sanctions against counsel for Defendants. After careful consideration, we reluctantly will not impose sanctions against defense counsel.
*601Under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this court, upon a motion from appellee and after determining that an appeal is frivolous, may “award just damages and single or double costs to the appellee.” “An appeal is frivolous if the result is obvious or the arguments are “wholly without merit.’” Cronin v. Town of Amesbury, 81 F.3d 257, 261 (1st Cir. 1996) (quoting Westcott Constr. Corp. v. Firemen’s Fund…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cronin v. Town of AmesburyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Candelario-Del-Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Westcott Construction Corp. v. Firemen's Fund of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Rosa-Rivera v. Dorado Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foss v. MarvicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Southbridge RE, LLC v. Kiavi Funding, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023