Legal Opinion

Reid v. Ham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff, Flora Q. Eeid, from an order of the District Court of Bamsey County, William Louis Kelly, J., made November 26, 1892, setting aside the service of the summons.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The defendant, being a citizen of the territory of Utah, was brought to- this state from- that territory under arrest as a fugitive from justice, upon a requisition, pursuant to the constitution and laws of the United States. While he was held in custody here under the criminal charge for which he had been‘returned to this state, this plaintiff instituted a civil action against him by the service of a summons. On motion the District Court set aside the service of the summons for the reason that it was considered that the defendant was exempt from liability to be so prosecuted civilly while so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lascelles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Adriance v. . LagraveNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Williams v. BaconNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  5. Sherman v. GundlachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bubar v. DizdarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. In re HendersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In re FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Rutledge v. KraussSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  5. State v. TaranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API