Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Osterberg

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1930No. 6,661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ford

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damages from defendant for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of defendant.

It appears that on April 18, 1927, plaintiff and his brother entered into an oral agreement with defendant to break 400 acres of land, defendant to furnish a gas tractor and a four-bottom Sattley plow and keep the same in repair, all necessary tools, equipment, gas and oil. Pursuant to the agreement, defendant turned over to plaintiff and his brother a tractor and plow, and they began work. Only three of the four bottoms were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sorenson v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Whitcomb v. BeyerleinMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Matson v. HinesMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Monson v. La France Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wollan v. LordMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Makino v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Wollan v. LordMontana Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API