Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1929No. 6,367PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ford

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff while employed as a member of a storehouse crew of defendant company, on account of alleged negligence. Defendants answered, denying the negligence charged, and alleging affirmatively that plaintiff assumed the risk and was guilty of contributory negligence. Issue was joined by reply. Upon the trial of the cause, and at the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, defendants’ motion for a nonsuit was sustained, and judgment entered accordingly. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Defendants’ motion for nonsuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grant v. NihillMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Anderson v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. McCabe v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Sorenson v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Supple v. AgnewIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Vonault v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Staff v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API