Legal Opinion

Fagerdahl v. North Coast Transportation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1934No. 24710. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Main, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was overruled, and the motion for new trial was sustained. From the judgment granting a new trial, the plaintiff appeals, and the defendant cross-appeals. The appellant Arne Fagerdahl will be referred to as though he were the only party appellant.

The facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Sullivan v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bennett v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Welsh v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Sullivan v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. BauersWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hayes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. New York Life Insurance Co. v. NewportWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gray v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API