Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fowler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1994No. 583PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*150WIEAND, Judge:

After Esdras Fowler had been tried by a jury and found guilty of third degree murder and possessing an instrument of crime, the trial court determined that defense counsel had been constitutionally ineffective when he failed to bolster Fowler’s testimony by calling an available witness to testify to Fowler’s good reputation for truth and veracity.1 Therefore, the trial court awarded a new trial. The Commonwealth appealed. After careful review, we reverse.

In Pennsylvania, a witness’s truthfulness may be attacked by showing that he or she has a bad reputation for truth and,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. SchwenkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. ShowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. WynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API