Legal Opinion

Laabs v. Bolger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

While other issues are raised by the parties, we deem it sufficient for the purpose of this appeal to confine this opinion to two issues:(1) Are the findings of fact of the trial court with respect to defendants’ acts of adverse possession against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?(2) If such findings are not against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence, are such findings sufficient to support the judgment adjudicating title in the disputed parcel in defendants ?

There is printed herein a detailed drawing which depicts the disputed area with relation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Northwoods Development Corp. v. KlementWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Illinois Steel Co. v. BudziszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Laurin v. WyroskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Otto v. CornellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. Conwell v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Madsen v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Marsh v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API