Triebsch v. Athletic Mining & Smelting Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
This is a claim by appellant against appellee for a compensation award under the Arkansas Workmen’s Compensation Law (see § 81-1301, et seq., Ark. Stats.).
At all times herein, appellee operated a smeltery for processing zinc ore. In the plant, two furnaces were located in each of five buildings or “blocks.” Furnaces 1 and 2 were located in Block 1, which was the most westerly block. In the' smeltering process the ore'was heated in the furnaces in order to remove impurities; and the fumes from the heated ore escaped through condensers along the side of the furnaces.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- J. L. Williams & Sons, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- McGregor & Pickett v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Elm Springs Canning Co. v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Herron Lumber Company v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Reynolds Metal Company v. BrumleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Scobey v. Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Duke v. Pekin Wood Products Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- W. Shanhouse & Sons, Inc. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.