Legal Opinion

Triebsch v. Athletic Mining & Smelting Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1951No. 4-9420PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is a claim by appellant against appellee for a compensation award under the Arkansas Workmen’s Compensation Law (see § 81-1301, et seq., Ark. Stats.).

At all times herein, appellee operated a smeltery for processing zinc ore. In the plant, two furnaces were located in each of five buildings or “blocks.” Furnaces 1 and 2 were located in Block 1, which was the most westerly block. In the' smeltering process the ore'was heated in the furnaces in order to remove impurities; and the fumes from the heated ore escaped through condensers along the side of the furnaces.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. J. L. Williams & Sons, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. McGregor & Pickett v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Elm Springs Canning Co. v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Herron Lumber Company v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metal Company v. BrumleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Scobey v. Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Duke v. Pekin Wood Products Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. W. Shanhouse & Sons, Inc. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API