City of Tucson v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA CTY.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
The petitioner, defendant in a suit instituted by the real parties in interest, seeks relief by way of special action from an order of the respondent court denying its motion for judgment on the pleadings. Since petitioner has no adequate remedy by appeal and we believe its motion should have been granted, we assume jurisdiction.
The complaint filed below against the City of Tucson and Pima County set forth three counts. The substance of Count One was that during the mid-1950’s the plaintiffs conveyed to Pima County the south ten feet of a parcel of property adjoining…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neiderhiser v. Henry's Drive-In, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Union Interchange, Inc. v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Choisser v. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. LoBueNevada Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Nails v. GuilbaultDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022