Legal Opinion

HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. Seymour

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 15, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 88-0365PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. (HSL) appeals from a declaratory judgment giving Monte Seymour a right of first refusal on any sale of HSL’s undivided one-half interest in jointly-owned property. We affirm because Seymour’s right of first refusal is a covenant running with the land which binds HSL.

Seymour’s right of first refusal arises from a provision contained in his contract to buy an undivided one-half interest in property owned by Autrice C. Copeland (now Freeman) in 1959 and duly recorded in 1965. The pertinent paragraph of the contract for sale states:

If…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. DomergueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Choisser v. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. City of Tucson v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Low v. Equity Programs, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API