HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. Seymour
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. (HSL) appeals from a declaratory judgment giving Monte Seymour a right of first refusal on any sale of HSL’s undivided one-half interest in jointly-owned property. We affirm because Seymour’s right of first refusal is a covenant running with the land which binds HSL.
Seymour’s right of first refusal arises from a provision contained in his contract to buy an undivided one-half interest in property owned by Autrice C. Copeland (now Freeman) in 1959 and duly recorded in 1965. The pertinent paragraph of the contract for sale states:
If…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harrison v. DomergueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Choisser v. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- City of Tucson v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
- HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Low v. Equity Programs, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.