Legal Opinion

Union Interchange, Inc. v. Allen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1962No. 10336PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

This is an action to recover on a written contract wherein plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $1,850 together with interest, attorneys’ fees and costs.

On May 16, 1959, defendants are alleged to have entered into a contract in writing, by the terms of which the defendants agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1,850 for contacting buyers by advertising in certain of the plaintiff’s publications. The representative of the plaintiff was apparently not a resident of Montana, neither did he maintain an office within the state. The agreement shows acceptance by the plaintiff at Seattle,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hart v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Pierce v. GowdyMontana Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adelman v. OnischukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Dodd v. City of East HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Eddleman v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Johnson v. DoranMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Tucson v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API