Union Interchange, Inc. v. Allen
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
This is an action to recover on a written contract wherein plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $1,850 together with interest, attorneys’ fees and costs.
On May 16, 1959, defendants are alleged to have entered into a contract in writing, by the terms of which the defendants agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1,850 for contacting buyers by advertising in certain of the plaintiff’s publications. The representative of the plaintiff was apparently not a resident of Montana, neither did he maintain an office within the state. The agreement shows acceptance by the plaintiff at Seattle,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Hart v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Pierce v. GowdyMontana Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adelman v. OnischukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Dodd v. City of East HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Eddleman v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Johnson v. DoranMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Tucson v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.