Legal Opinion

Greene v. Greene

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 23, 1988No. 5074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals from the granting by the trial court of the plaintiff’s motion to modify that portion of the judgment of dissolution relating to alimony. The issues raised on appeal are that the court *513erred (1) in finding a change of circumstances to be unforeseen,1 (2) in finding that the plaintiff had unmet needs that required an increase in alimony, (3) in awarding counsel fees to the plaintiff, (4) in its conduct of the trial, and (5) in failing to rule on the plaintiffs motion to open. We find no error.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1980. The dissolution decree incorporated…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Cookson v. CooksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Holley v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bucy v. BucyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. In re Halle T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Schott v. SchottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Greene v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Perry v. Perry, No. Fa80 0183745 (Nov. 1, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API