Legal Opinion

Schott v. Schott

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 9, 1989No. 6592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is the defendant’s appeal in an action for dissolution of a marriage.1 The dissolution judgment ordered the sale of the marital home and distribution of the proceeds to the parties. The defendant’s first three claims of error involve the common theme that the state trial referee, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, erred in ordering the payment of a bank debt, secured by an attachment, as an obligation of the entire marital estate. We find no error. In addition, the defendant asks this court to award her counsel fees expended in pursuit of this appeal.

*334The following facts are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beede v. BeedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Miller v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Hurtado v. HurtadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. North v. NorthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Holcombe v. HolcombeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API