Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Navasota v. Todd

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 222-3356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of First Supreme Judicial District. Action by the First National Bank of Na-vasota against R. A. Barker. Judgment for intervener, J. S. Todd, was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (212 S. W. 219), and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Plaintiff, First National Bank of Navasota, instituted this suit to recover of R. A. Barker upon two notes executed by the latter, one upon January 20, 1916, for the sum of $5,416.20 payable to the bank, the other executed December 1, A. D. 1915, payable to A. P. Terrell in the sum of $441.80, which note had been transferred to the bank; and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien executed by Barker on January 20, 1916, to secure the payment of these notes.

J. S. Todd intervened, claiming as assignee of Evans Snyder Buell Company, asserting a-prior and superior lien to the chattels covered by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boswell v. PannellTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bowen v. Lansing Wagon WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ingenhuett v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Maloney v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. First Nat. Bank of Navasota v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adkins-Polk Co. v. RhodesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Brooks v. Asherton State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. NettervilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Home Nat. Bank of Cleburne v. HerdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Spicknall v. Panhandle State Bank of BorgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API