Legal Opinion

Boswell v. Pannell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1915No. 2424PublishedCited by 80 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Travis County. Pannell sued Boswell and others and recovered judgment, which was affirmed on appeal by defendants, who then obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yantis

The purpose of this suit, which was filed by Pannell, the defendant in error, was to cancel a deed, and to recover a judgment for $1200 for the alleged misapplication of a vendor’s lien note in said amount. The defendant in error recovered judgment against the plaintiffs in error, Boswell, Barrow and Boatwright, B. D. Shofner, one of the defendants in the trial court, having been dismissed from the suit. Boatwright did 'not prosecute an appeal from the judgment of the trial court. Boswell and Barrow appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, where the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steffian v. Milmo National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Clark v. HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. LauricellaTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Link v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Tyler Building & Loan Ass'n v. Beard & ScalesTexas Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis MunozTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Central Power & Light Co./Cities of Alice v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Grieger v. VegaTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In the Interest of B.L.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API