Legal Opinion
Dorfman v. Hassett
New York County Courts
Decided November 21, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
This is an application by the tenant for permission, pursuant to section 112 of the Binghamton City Court Act (L. 1931, ch. 482), to appeal from an intermediate order of the City Court, which denied tenant’s motion to dismiss a summary proceeding, against him. The tenant appeared specially in the City Court and moved to dismiss such proceeding upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the same, as insufficient notice had been given to legally terminate his tenancy.
The tenant contends that he should be granted permission to appeal from this intermediate order because if…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Alexander's Department Stores, Inc. v. Ohrbach's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ellsworth v. EllsworthNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Urquhart v. UrquhartNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Lamb v. GadaNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- de Marigny v. de MarignyNew York Supreme Court · 1948