Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 17, 2011No. 471,2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

As part of a plea agreement, Kevin Moore agreed to a sentence that included probation and restitution. Restitution was to be quantified “at a later date.” Two months after discharging Moore from probation in an Order reflecting that Moore owed no restitution, the Superior Court ordered specific restitution to parties inconsistent with what Moore had agreed to at sentencing. Several years later, after receiving no post discharge restitution payments consistent with the Order, the court issued a civil judgment against Moore which resulted in the “intercept” of a Delaware…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Vincent v. Eastern Shore MarketsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Formosa Plastics Corp. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Redick v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API