Legal Opinion

Redick v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 20, 2004No. 487, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, Randrew R. Redick, was indicted by a grand jury on charges of the use, possession with intent to distribute, or sale, of fifty or more unlawful telecommunication and access devices. 1 Redick entered a guilty plea to Count I of the indictment and admitted to a violation of his existing probation. 2 Re-dick was sentenced to two years in jail for the unlawful telecommunications access device offense. That period of incarceration was suspended, however, for decreasing levels of probation. Redick was also fined $300 and ordered to pay restitution as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. FutrellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Moody v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Pratt v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. United States v. Louis WolfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. State, Victims' Compensation Assistance Program v. ChianeseSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. State v. PulginiSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. State v. ShrievesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API