Vincent v. Eastern Shore Markets
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice.
Claimant-Appellant Dennis Vincent appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court affirming the Industrial Accident Board’s (the “IAB” or the “Board”) dismissal of Vincent’s petition to determine compensation due. Vincent raises two arguments on appeal. First, he contends that in dismissing the petition, the Board violated his due process rights and the notice requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act (the “APA”).1 Second, he contends that the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We find merit to Vincent’s first argument and reverse.2
I. Facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ward v. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONSSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Kelley v. Perdue FarmsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
- Campos v. Daisy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Estate of Jackson v. Genesis Health VenturesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.