Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 28, 2008No. 125, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Defendant-Appellant Clinton N. Harris appeals his conviction and sentence for a crime to which he pled guilty on January 3, 2001, for which he was not sentenced until February 8, 2008. Harris argues that his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because the delay in sentencing violated his right to a speedy trial and due process. He further argues that, in the alternative, he should have been permitted to withdraw his guilty plea because it was plain error for the Superior Court to sentence him in excess of the sentencing recommendation. In denying his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Robert Allen Gattis v. Robert Snyder, Warden, Delaware Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Monceaux v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  5. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API