Kuehl v. City of Edmonds
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered May 27, 1914, in favor of the plaintiff, setting aside a reassessment on appeal from the order of the city council confirming the roll.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
In 1909, the city of Edmonds provided by ordinance for the improvement of Dayton street. It was held in the case of Peabody v. Edmonds, 68 Wash. 610, 123 Pac. 1018, that an assessment to the extent of $6,025.74 would be valid. This case followed, and was decided upon the authority of, Chehalis v. Cory, 54 Wash. 190, 102 Pac. 1027, 104 Pac. 768. We understand from the record that an assessment was levied and payments have been made by individual property owners in accordance with the judgment of this court. Reference to our former decision will show that the estimated cost of the improvement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frederick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Town of Tumwater v. PixWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Cline v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Olson v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Lee v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Chehalis v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Triangle Traders v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.