Legal Opinion

Town of Tumwater v. Pix

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1897No. 2739PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.—Hon. Charles W. Hodgdon, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Appellant, a municipal corporation of the fourth class under the laws of Washington, brought this action to enforce the collection of an amount levied by reassessment, on account of street improvements, against respondent’s property. From a judgment in respondent’s favor the town has appealed. From the, record and briefs of counsel it appears that the principal reason for the judgment of the lower court was that it had never been determined by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction that the original assessment was illegal or void.

TJ…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hemen v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Nolan v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Homan Mfg. Co., Inc. v. H. A. LongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  2. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Associated Gen. Contractors of Washington v. KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Collins v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API