Olson v. City of Watertown
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.
Defendant is a municipal corporation, and several years ago took steps to pave and did pave a certain street of the city. Plaintiffs are owners of abutting property upon which special assessments were levied to pay for the cost of the pavement. Claiming that the proceedings were void and that the city had no jurisdiction to enter into the contract for paving, plaintiff's on the 16th of September, 1921, brought an action to restrain the carrying out of a contract with the C. H. Atkinson Paving Company to pave the street and to restrain the levy and enforcement of a special assessment therefor…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mattingly v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Searle v. City of LeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Huron v. JelgerhuisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Sioux Falls v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Fenton v. AckermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Empey v. Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Lexington v. Wilson's EstateMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.