Organic Chemicals, Inc. v. Carroll Products, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ENSLEN, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS
Plaintiff (hereinafter ORGANIC) has asked the Court to decide whether or not separate trials should be held to determine the issues of liability and damages. ORGANIC wants the Court to first decide the question of liability and subsequently, if necessary, the issue of damages. Defendant (hereinafter CARROLL) opposes the separation.
It is important for the Court to resolve this controversy at an early date because the outcome of the motion may well signal what discovery is appropriate between this time and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Douglas F. Warner v. Donat Rossignol v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Moss v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Baker v. Waterman S. S. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Larsen v. PowellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Ismail v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Guild Associates, Inc. v. Bio-Energy (Washington), LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.