Legal Opinion

Perucca v. Baltimore & O. R.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 3, 1929No. Nos. 3962, 3963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

The Stutz roadster of Pete M. Perueca, driven by his wife, Mary Perueca, was struck by a westbound engine as the car was passing from the south to the north, over the tracks of the defendant corporation, at a public crossing, in the borough of Sutersville in the state of Pennsylvania. The car was destroyed and the driver injured as a result. In the suit instituted by Perueca and his wife to recover damages for the injuries so sustained, the court below directed a verdict in favor of defendant upon the ground that, notwithstanding the testimony of Mrs. Perueca that she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. MaidmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  2. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Cohen v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Radziemenski v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  2. Bash v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Garrett v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  4. Kilmer v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API