Legal Opinion

New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. Maidment

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 12, 1909No. 35PublishedCited by 64 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, Maidment, hereafter styled plaintiff, sued the railroads, hereafter styled defendants, for damages sustained by him in a collision between an automobile, driven by him, and defendants’ passenger train. The plaintiff recovered a verdict, and to review the judgment entered thereon defendants sued out this writ. A number of errors are alleged, but in our view the case turns on the refusal to give binding instructions for the defendants. If the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the point was well taken. To that question we therefore…

2Cited by64 opinions

  1. Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  2. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Washington & Old Dominion Railway Co. v. Zell's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Bunton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Krodel v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API