Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garrett v. Pennsylvania R.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 11, 1931No. 4406Published

1DissentEvans, Circuit Judge

The rule requiring the direction of a verdict where the evidence is undisputed or of such a conclusive character that a verdict against it would be set aside by the court is well established. Equally well settled is the rule that a mere scintilla of evidence does not call for its submission to a jury. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co., 267 U. S. 248, 254, 45 S. Ct. 300, 69 L. Ed. 597; Mearns v. B. & O. S. W. R. (C. C. A.) 284 F. 31. It seems to the writer, however, that the evidence, inferences and presumptions in the instant case necessitated their submission to the jury for its determination of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  3. Ryan v. DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  4. Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co. v. DivineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Perucca v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API