Legal Opinion

United States v. Adhiamo Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1999No. 98-4466PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge Motz wrote the opinion, in which Judge Hamilton and Judge Trader joined.

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

After a jury found Adhiamo Mitchell guilty of harboring and concealing a fugitive, the district court concluded that the Government had failed to prove that he had engaged in any affirmative act of harboring and so granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal. Because the Government put forth evidence from which a rational jury could conclude that Mitchell committed an affirmative act of harboring, the evidence was sufficient to support…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Daniel Nelson SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Deborah Stacey, A/K/A Deborah Horodecky, A/K/A Deborah PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. LipfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Zabriskie (Dean)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Annamalai AnnamalaiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. DurginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API