State v. Durgin

The defendant, Gladys Durgin, appeals her conviction following a bench trial in Franklin District Court {Gordon, J.) for hindering apprehension or prosecution by harboring or concealing another. See RSA 642:3, 1(a) (2007). She argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict her because lying to the police about the whereabouts of her daughter did not constitute harboring or concealing another within the meaning of RSA 642:3,1(a). We reverse.

The following is undisputed. In August 2007, three members of the Webster Police Department went to the defendant’s home with an arrest warrant for…