Legal Opinion

United States v. Zabriskie (Dean)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2005No. 02-4228, 02-4225PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.

Dean and Slade Zabriskie appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for new trial on the grounds (1) the jury lacked sufficient evidence to convict them of concealing and harboring a fugitive from arrest in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1071, and (2) the district judge erred in giving a single juror a modified Allen instruction 1 during an ex parte colloquy with him while deliberations were proceeding. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we reverse and remand the matter to the district court for a new trial.

I. BACKGROUND

Dean Zabriskie, a criminal defense…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. VerbickasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. DewberryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Annamalai AnnamalaiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API