Legal Opinion

Lamb v. City of Decatur

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided November 19, 1996No. 95-2167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BAKER, District Judge.

This class action alleges violation of the plaintiffs’ civil rights. The action arises out of a demonstration marking the one year anniversary of a lock-out at the Staley Manufacturing Plant in Decatur, Illinois. At the demonstration, police sprayed pepper spray into the crowd of demonstrators. Count I of the amended complaint alleges violation of the Fourth Amendment as prohibited by 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Count II alleges a conspiracy to violate the constitution and § 1983. Counts III-VI allege state law violations. The defendants have moved for summary judgment as to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of HumboldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of HumboldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Headwaters Forest Defense v. the County of HumboldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Passing v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API