Legal Opinion

Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of Humboldt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2000No. 98-17250PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge PERGERSON; Concurrence by Judge BRIGHT.

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Nine environmental activists, along with an entity called Headwaters Forest Defense, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the use of pepper spray on the activists during three protests in Humboldt County constituted excessive and unreasonable force in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights. The named defendants included Humboldt County and its Sheriffs Department; Humboldt County Sheriff Dennis Lewis and Chief Deputy Sheriff Gary Philp, who authorized the use of pepper spray; the City of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Santos v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Environmental Council of Sacramento v. SlaterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000
  3. Hubbard v. Twin Oaks Health & Rehabilitation CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
  4. Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports (US), Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2006
  5. Natural Resources Defense Council v. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API