Legal Opinion

Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of Humboldt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 2001No. 98-17250PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

ORDER

With the filing of the Amended Opinion, the panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Pregerson and W. Fletcher voted to deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Bright so recommended said rejection.

The suggestion for en banc rehearing has been circulated to the full court, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

OPINION

Nine environmental activists, along with an…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Santos v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. James F. Robinson v. Solano County Brian Cauwells, Solano County Sheriff's Deputy Officer Gary Faulkner, Solano County Sheriff's Deputy OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. James Tracey Miller v. Clark County Edward J. Bylsma, in His Capacity as a Police Officer for Clark County and as an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Young v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Boyd v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API