Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Journeymen Stonecutters' Ass'n

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs' taken in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Green, Y. G.

The complainants comprise two classes — -first, seventeen individuals and copartnerships, embracing all of the members of the Master Stonecutters’ Association of the city of Newark, a voluntary association, not incorporated, composed of master stone-cutters engaged in the business of cutting, dressing and selling stone for building and other purposes in the counties of Essex and Hudson; and, second, two individuals, Jacob Hahn and *520Henry Zimmerman, who are alleged to be skilled journeymen stonecutters residing in Essex county.

The defendants are “ The Journeymen Stonecutters’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Motley v. DarlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Trautwein v. HarbourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. McGovern v. Van RiperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Carroll v. L. No. 269New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Leeds v. HarrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Harris v. GeierNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API