Commonwealth v. Matos
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence after appellant was found guilty of robbery, criminal conspiracy, possessing an instrument of crime, and a violation of the Uniform Firearms Act. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by sentencing him pursuant to the mandatory sentencing provisions of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9712,1 as they are *403inapplicable to unarmed accomplices. We disagree and affirm the judgment of sentence.
The facts surrounding the present case are set forth in the trial court’s opinion:... On April 16,1987, at approximately 7:15 p.m., four (4) men robbed a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. GrimmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ChiariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.