Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Matos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1989No. 1412PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence after appellant was found guilty of robbery, criminal conspiracy, possessing an instrument of crime, and a violation of the Uniform Firearms Act. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by sentencing him pursuant to the mandatory sentencing provisions of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9712,1 as they are *403inapplicable to unarmed accomplices. We disagree and affirm the judgment of sentence.

The facts surrounding the present case are set forth in the trial court’s opinion:... On April 16,1987, at approximately 7:15 p.m., four (4) men robbed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. GrimmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. GreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. ChiariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API